Abstract
Antenatal care is a form of preventive medicine that pregnant women to allows maintain a state of good health throughout pregnancy, and to improve their chances of having a safe delivery of healthy infants. To achieve this aim, it is a widely held belief that pregnant women need to book early preferable before 14 weeks gestation. This is a retrospective study which reveals among others that late booking is still a common practice in the developing countries with average gestational age at booking being 23.59 (+/- 8.45) weeks, and only 14% of the women booked before the end of first trimester. Nulliparity or low parity was found to be the only factor that favoured early booking. However, gestational age at booking as a sole factor for predicting the pregnancy outcome was found to be insignificant as the outcome was same for early and late bookers. Unbooked pregnant women were found to be twice at risk of operative delivery, four times more likely to suffer delivery complications and twice likely to have low birthweight babies when compared to booked patients. In conclusion, findings of this study confirm the importance of antenatal care for better maternal and foetal outcome, however gestational age at booking as a sole factor is a poor predictor of pregnancy outcome. It is believed that this finding which is in tandem with the new WHO antenatal care protocol will generate divergent views among the health care givers and modify our current practice of Antenatal care to a more focused and effective risk assessment system.
Keywords: Gestational, antenatal, delivery, outcome
Résumé
Les soins prénatale est une forme de médecine préventive pour les femmes enceintes pour faire maintenir l’état de bonne santé durant toute la grossesse et d’augmenter leur chances d’avoir un
accouchement sain. Pour atteindre ce but, c’est une croyance généralement que les femmes enceintes doivent s’enregistrer tôt, preferablemet avant 14 semaines de gestation. Cette l’étude rétrospective relève parmi d’autres les enregistrements tardifs sont commune dans les pays sous développés avec une moyenne d’age de gestation de 23.59+_8.45) semaines et seulement 14% des femmes enregistrés avant la fin du premier trimestre. La parité faible était faite comme étant le seul facteur qui favorisait l’enregistrement précoce. Cependant l’age gestationnel à l’enregistrement comme l’unique facteur pour prédire l’issue de la grossesse avait été trouvé important puisque l’issue était le même pour les enregistrements précoces ou tardifs. Les femmes enceintes non enregistrées avaient des doubles risques d’accouchement par opération, 4 fois plus de risque de complication de l’accouchement et 2 fois des risques d’avoir des bébés a poids faible à la naissance comparativement aux patients enregistrés. Les résultats de cette étude confirment l’importance des soins prénatals pour des résultats maternels et feotal meilleurs. Ces résultats sont en accord avec le protocole des soins de santé prénatale de l’OMS vont apportés des vues divergentes parmi les personnels de santé et modifiera les pratiques prénatales currents avec plus d’attention sur les risques effectifs.
Correspondence: Dr. M.A. Okunlola, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Email: templecity108@yahoo.com
Literaturhinweise
Omigbodun AO. Preconception and antenatal care. In: Kwawukume EY, Emuveyan EE, editors. Comprehensive obstetrics in the Tropics. Accra: Asante and Hittscher. 2002; Ch 2. 7-14
World Health Organization. WHO antenatal care randomized trial: manual for the implementation of the new model. WHO Programme to map best reproductive practices. Geneva: World Health Organization 2002.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). Clinical Guideline. Antenatal care routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. London: RCOG Press 20-03.
Okunlola MA, Ayinde OA, Owonikoko KM, Omigbodun AO. Factors influencing gestational age at antenatal booking at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of obstetrics and Gynaecology 2006; 26(3): 195-197.
Gharoro EP, Igbafe AA. Antenatal care: some characteristics of the booking visit in a major teaching hospital in the developing world. Medical Science Monitor. 2000; 6:519-522.
Ekele BA, Audu LR. Gestational age at first antenatal clinic booking in Sokoto, Northern Nigeria. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Science. 1998; 27: 161-163.
LaVeist T A, Keith V M, and Gutierrez M L . Black/white differences in prenatal care utilization: an assessment of predisposing and enabling factors. Health Serv Res. 1995; April; 30(1 Pt 1): 43–58.
Carla Janzen and Williiam L. Gill. Essentials of Normal Newborn Assessment and Care. Current Obstetric and Gynecology Diagnosis and Treatment. 9th Edition 2003;. Chapter 11 page 222-233.
Al-shammari SA, Khoja T, Jarallah JS. The pattern of antenatal visit with emphasis on gestational age at booking in Riyadh Health Centers. Journal of Reproductive and Social Health. 1994; 114:62-66.
Baldo MH, al-Mazrou YY, Forag MK, Aziz KM, Khan MU. Antenatal care, attitudes and practices. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics. 1995; 41(Suppl 1):21-29.
Aboyeji A.P. Trends in Maternity Mortality in Ilorin, Nigeria. Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1988; vol. 15, 1, 15-20.
Fasubaa OB, Ogunniyi SO, Ezechi OC. Maternal Mortality in Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital Complex, Ile-Ife. A comparison of maternal death in youth and older women. Nigeria Journal of Medicine. 1999; Vol 8(4). Pp 147-151.