Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: evaluation of reagent strips in comparison to microbiological culture

Resum

Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy, the major risk factor for symptomatic urinary tract infection during pregnancy have been recommended.This cross sectional study was conducted to determine prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in Ibadan and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and relative cost effectiveness of dipstick tests for nitrite and leucocyte esterase in comparison to laboratory culture. Two hundred and five patients, presenting for their first antenatal visit at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, participated in the study. Urine samples obtained from the participants were subjected to two tests; reagent dipstick test for nitrite and leucocyte esterase and routine laboratory culture, which is the gold standard for diagnosis. Main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the reagent dipstick tests as well as likelihood ratios. The prevalence of asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy with routine laboratory culture and using combined leucocyte esterase and nitrite strip tests were 10.7% and 11.7% respectively. Compared with laboratory culture, combined strip tests had sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive values of 50%, 92.9% and 93.9% respectively, indicating a statistically significant lower level of accuracy (P < 0.05). The corresponding likelihood ratios for positive and negative strip tests (LR+ and LR-) were 7 and 0.5 respectively. The study concludes that combined Leucocyte esterase-nitrite dipstick test is not sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used for routine screening of bacteriuria in pregnancy in place of laboratory culture, though may be more cost effective in low resource settings.

Keywords: Asymptomatic bacteriuria, pregnancy, dipstick tests, laboratory culture

Résumé
Le dépistage de la bactériurie symptomatiques pendant la grossesse, le risqué majeur de l’infection symptomatique de la voie urinaire pendant la grossesse ont été recommandé. Cette étude était conduite dans le but de déterminer le taux de la bactériurie asymptomatique à Ibadan et évaluer le diagnostic juste et le cout effectif relatif des tests rapide par nitrite et estérase leucocyte en comparaison avec la culture au laboratoire. Deux cent cinq patients, se présentant pour leur première visite à la clinique anténatale au centre universitaire hospitalier, Ibadan participaient a cette étude. Les échantillons d’urine étaient obtenues de chaque participant et étaient soumisse a deux tests: le test à kit de nitrite et leucocyte estérase et la culture au laboratoire, qui est le standard pour le diagnostic. Les mesures des résultats étaient la sensitivité, spécificité, les valeurs prédictives positive et négative des tests à kit aussi bien que l’estimation des proportions. La prévalence de la bactériurie asymptomatique en grossesse avec la culture en laboratoire et combinant avec les tests kits de leucocyte estérase et nitrite étaient de 10.7% et 11.7% respectivement. L’étude comparée de la culture et les tests à kits combines avait une sensibilité, une spécificité et des valeurs prédictives négatives de 50%, 92.9% et 93.9% respectivement, indiquant une valeur statistique significativement faible (P < 0.05). Les proportions correspondantes des tests à kit positifs et négatifs (LR+ et LR-) étaient de 7 et 0.5 respectivement. Cette étude a conclut que le combiné test kit de leucocyte estérase- nitrite n’est pas suffisamment sensible et spécifique à être utilisé de façon routinier dans le dépistage de la bactériurie pendant la grossesse que la culture, bien que qu’elle peut être plus coûteux dans les pays sous développés.

Correspondence: D.O Awonuga, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta. P.M.B. 3031 Sapon Post Office, Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. E-mail – lekanawonuga@yahoo.com

pdf (anglès)

Referències

Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC,Hauth JC and Wenstrom KD. Renal and Urinary Tract Disorders In: Williams Obstetrics (Gunningham F.G., Gant N.F et al eds) 21st edn. Mc Graw-Hill, Medical Publishing Division. New York: 2001. 1251-1271.

Archbald F, Verma U and Tejani N. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria with Microstix. J Reprod Med. 1984; 29 (4): 272-294.

Population Reference Bureau. 2005 World Population Data Sheet, 2005. Washington D.C.

Robson SC. Hypertension and Renal disease in pregnancy. In Dewhurst’s Textbook of Obstetric and Gynaecology for Postgraduate (Edmonds DK Ed.) 6th Edn. Blackwell Science Ltd. Oxford: 1999. 166-185.

Smaill F. Antibiotics for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy (Cochrane Review). In the Reproductive Health Library, Issue 9, 2006. Oxford: Update Software Ltd.

Miller LK and Cox SM. Urinary tract infection complicating pregnancy. Infect Dis Clin of North Am 1997; 11 (1): 13-26.

Garingalo – Molina FD. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Among pregnant women: Overview of Diagnostic Approaches. Phil J Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 29 (4): 177-186.

Abyad A. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: Urinalysis versus urine culture. J Fam Phys 1991; 33 (5): 471-479.

Devile WLJM, Yzermans JC, Duijn NP and Bezemer PD. The urine dipstick test useful to rule out infections. A meta-analysis of the accuracy. BMJ Urol 2004; 4:4.

Bachman JW, Heise RH, Naessens JM et al. A study of various tests to detect asymptomatic urinary tract infection in an obstetric population. JAMA 1993; 270: 1971-1974.

Hagay Z, Levy R and Miskin A. Uriscreen, a rapid enzymatic urine screening test: Useful predictor of significant bacteriuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 1996, 87: 410-413.

Miller L, Debuque L and Leialoha C. Rapid enzymatic urine screening test to detect bacteriuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 2000, 95: 601-604

Nachum R, Arce J and Berzofsky R. Gram negative bacteriuria of pregnancy: rapid detection by a chromogenic limulus amoebocyte lysate assay. Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 68 (2): 215-219.

Shelton SD, Boggess KA, Kirvan K, Sedor F and Herbert WN. Urinary interleukin–8 with asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 97 (4): 583-586.

Okonkwo CA, Okpere EE, and Ande ABA. Evaluation of chlorhexidine in the detection of bacteriuria in pregnancy. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 23 (1): 17.

Patterson TF and Andriole VT. Bacteriuria in Pregnancy. Current Treatment Options in infectious disease 2003; 5: 81-87.

Andriole V and Patterson TF. Epidemiology, Natural history and management of urinary tract infection in pregnancy. Med Clin North Am 1991; 75 (2): 359-371

Nicolle LE. Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy. In: Canadian Guide to Clinical Preventive Health Care. Ottawa: Health Canada, 1994; 100-106.

Nnatu S, Essien EE, Akinkugbe A and Odum CU. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant Nigeria Patients. Clin Exp. Obst. Gyn. 1989; 16 (4): 126-128.

Mandara MU and Shittu SO. Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Antenatal Patients at ABUTH Hospital Zaria, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 16(1): 41-45.

Okonofua FF, Adediran A and Okonofua B. Incidence and Pattern of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria of Pregnancy in Nigerian Women. Nig Med. Pract. 1989; 17 (3): 35-38

Olusanya O. Ogunledun A and Fakoya T.A. Asymptomatic significant bacteriuria among pregnant and non-pregnant women in Sagamu Nigeria. Cent Afr J Med. 1992; 38 (7): 197-302.

Gratacos E, Torres PJ, Villa J, Alonso P and Cararach V. Screening and treatment of asymtomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy to prevent pyelonephritis. J Infect Dis. 1994; 169: 1390-1392.

US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Screening for asymptomatic bacteriuria: Recommendation Statement. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 2004.

US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Screening for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Second edition Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. 1996.

Tincello DG and Richmond DH. Evaluation of reagent strips in detecting asymptomatic bacteriuria in early pregnancy: Prospective case series. BMJ 1998 Feb; (7129): 455-457.

Schuls KF and Grimes DA. The Lancet Handbook of Essential Concept In Clinical Research (1st edn) Elsevier, London 2006.

Rouse DJ, Andrews WW, Goldenberg RL and Owen J. Screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria of pregnancy to prevent pyelonephritis: a cost-effectiveness and cost-benefits analysis. Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 86: 119 –123

Etherington IJ and James DK. Reagent strip testing of antenatal urine specimens for infection. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993; 100: 806-808.